For now, parsing.py support the following searchĪbout duckduck.go, because the results are clean any very easily In fact,Įveryone can add their own CSS selectors while subclassing the abstract Parsing happens much more stable and is more extendable. So I rewrote the parsing.py module of GoogleScraper. Parsing SERP pages with many search engines This isĮssentially what I made with the parsing module. Mostly it's much better to justĮrease whole modules and reimplement things completely anew. GoogleScraper has grown evolutionary and I am waisting a Implement, the hard part is to extend the project without blowing legacyĬode up. It's not a problem of missing ideas and features that I want to It to be (that's probably a quite common feeling under us programmers). Offers every week (Sorry if I cannot accept any request :( ).īut unfortunately my progress with this project is not as good as I want Imagined that I ever achieve this) and I receive up to 2 mails with job Recently it gotĪ little bit bigger (I have 115 github stars now, would've never I worked on every now and again in the last year or so. Had some motivation and energy left, which is quite nice considering myįull time university week and a programming job besides. Link can a decay factor, because when the link is new, it matters more, then as it gets old it can matter less.It's been quite a while since I worked on my projects. Links may pass more or less value depending on when they were created and how long they've existed. It's essentially not passing as much value out. It's likely that with those they may pass less value because there are so many links already on that page, and essentially the link dilution is happening there. Links on pages with many other links, and I don't mean many like 100. I'm going to link to that site from other places or try and do some actually link earning to that page to help the value that it's driving." Too Many Links That's often why some SEO folks will say, "hey, I got a great link from an article on this news site. If a Seattle Times article performs particularly well a link from this article will pass more value than lesser linked to pages. Links from a page has a good external and internal link profile pass more value. Search engines devalue links from spammy pages. You might have a beautiful link from the Seattle Times, but if they are not paying attention to what's going with their site and lots of spammers are posting links to the same page it could hurt your SEO. Links from site that have too many spammy or manipulative links may be devalued. Links from sidebars or footers are associated with advertising, promotions, or sponsorships, which don’t pass much authority. The best possible place for me to get a link is in the content, because that's where the article or the editorial authority is coming from. Links from a page's content or body text will pass more value than links from a footer or sidebar. That anchor text in the link is something that search engines value pretty highly. It is probably going to help you rank better for this precise phrase. If you've got a link from the Seattle Times to Plaid Shirts Rule and that link says "plaid shirts," in the anchor text. Links that contain anchor text related keywords that you're targeting may help you rank better for those specific terms and phrases. Google and Bing are going to know that those are the same entity and aren’t going to be treated as truly external and unique sites. For example, if a network of blog sites owned by the same entity links to each other doesn’t seem very diversified. Links from sites owned by unique entities tend to be more valuable than sites owned by the same company. If a site has already linked to me once a second link that comes in from another page on their site would not be as valuable as a link from another site. Links from sites that haven't linked to you before tend to be more valuable than links from sites that already have link pointing at your domain. Well, it could very well be the case that their links come from more important sources than yours do. They don't look like they have as many links as mine. Links from more important and authoritative sites are going to tend to be of higher value than links from sites that are less important. They're going to value it much more highly in terms of the editorial value. That external vote from another site is something that search engines are going to take far more seriously than an internal link. Search engines look at external links like a vote in favor of a site. Today we're talking about how search engines value links! External vs InternalĮxternal links tend to be more valuable than internal links.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |